[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9364B0.5020604@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:13:20 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE
On 2011-03-30 17:30, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:22:48AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So wee need this as stable fix because FLUSH request can get ahead of
>> REQUEUED requests and it can break some drivers?
>
> Yes, I think so. All we need is just replacing elv_insert() calls in
> blk-flush.c with list_add_tail(). Something like the following. I'll
> test it and send a proper patch later. Thanks.
I'd suggest I just mark the queued patch for stable.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists