[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110330173252.GA24058@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:32:52 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: block: eliminate ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:13:20PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2011-03-30 17:30, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:22:48AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >> So wee need this as stable fix because FLUSH request can get ahead of
> >> REQUEUED requests and it can break some drivers?
> >
> > Yes, I think so. All we need is just replacing elv_insert() calls in
> > blk-flush.c with list_add_tail(). Something like the following. I'll
> > test it and send a proper patch later. Thanks.
>
> I'd suggest I just mark the queued patch for stable.
Ah, right. It might not apply without conflict but they're basically
the same changes. Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists