lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SNT111-DS16E628E3B6501DBCF9E19CA7BF0@phx.gbl>
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:13:55 +0100
From:	limp <johnkyr83@...mail.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Minimum time slice for relaible Linux execution

Dear all,

I have developed a framework similar to a hypervisor that switches between
Linux and a RT domain.
As RT priority is of highest importance, I want to give more time to the RT
domain *but* I also want to give Linux adequate time for being able to
operate.

Could anyone advise me on how to determine the minimum possible time slice
that I can give to Linux so that it doesn't crash?

That is, if I periodically execute my RT domain every ms and then I switch
to Linux, what's the minimum time that should be given to Linux, until the
next RT domain execution? 

NOTE: The RT domain and Linux are not executed concurrently, i.e. the RT
domain is executed first and then Linux executes until the next RT domain
execution.

Thank you all in advance.

John K.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ