[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1103311724100.9662@x980>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:26:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, venki@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, peterz@...radead.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH V4 4/5] cpuidle: driver for xen
> > >> xen_arch_setup() does this:
> > >>
> > >> pm_idle = default_idle;
> > >> boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_HALT;
What happens on a Xen kernel if these lines are not there?
Does Xen export the C-states tables to Dom0 kernel, and the Dom0
kernel has an acpi processor driver, and thus it would try to
use all the C-states?
If yes, must Xen show those tables to Dom?
If it did not, then the lines above would not be necessary,
as in the absence of any C-states, the kernel should
use halt by default.
thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists