[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1104010245290.2797@x980>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kurup_avinash@...oo.com, maciej.rutecki@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, stable@...nel.org, #.34+@...atten.dmk.lab
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, ioapic: Skip looking for ioapic overrides when
ioapics are not present
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > @@ -3789,6 +3789,10 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity)
> > {
> > int ioapic, pin, idx;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > + if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
> > + return -1;
> > +#endif
>
> That #ifdef is very ugly. Please introduce a suitable helper function in
> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h - acpi_irq_ioapic_model() or so, which could be
> used like this:
>
> if (!acpi_irq_ioapic_model())
> return -1;
>
> And would be defined in the !CONFIG_ACPI case as well.
It would be better to compile _none_ of acpi_get_override_irq() for !ACPI.
-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists