[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110401075011.GD7594@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:50:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kurup_avinash@...oo.com, maciej.rutecki@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, stable@...nel.org, #.34+@...atten.dmk.lab
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86, ioapic: Skip looking for ioapic overrides when
ioapics are not present
* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> > > @@ -3789,6 +3789,10 @@ int acpi_get_override_irq(u32 gsi, int *trigger, int *polarity)
> > > {
> > > int ioapic, pin, idx;
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > + if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
> > > + return -1;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > That #ifdef is very ugly. Please introduce a suitable helper function in
> > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h - acpi_irq_ioapic_model() or so, which could be
> > used like this:
> >
> > if (!acpi_irq_ioapic_model())
> > return -1;
> >
> > And would be defined in the !CONFIG_ACPI case as well.
>
> It would be better to compile _none_ of acpi_get_override_irq() for !ACPI.
Yeah, agreed - so just move the function into acpi.c and provide an inline stub
in acpi.h for the !ACPI case.
Note: find_irq_entry() would have to be exported from io_apic.c in this case,
renamed to ioapic_find_irq_entry() or so - and a stub provided for the !IO_APIC
case.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists