linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHES] Generalize PCI <-> OF node matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1302213059.2458.42.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:50:59 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	monstr@...str.eu
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	bheglaas@...gle.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, bigeasy@...uxtronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generalize PCI <-> OF node matching

On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:54 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> There are several coding style issues.
> Please look at it through checkpatch.pl.

I tend to generally ignore checkpatch :-) I have my reasons... I'll have
a quick look see if there's anything really worthwhile in there but in
general I dislike "absolute" rules such as what checkpatch imposes.

> Compilation is fine for Microblaze as you surely saw.
> I am not able to test it on real hw right now but I will ask for
> remote connection to the board.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/