linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHES] Generalize PCI <-> OF node matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bheglaas@...gle.com,
	monstr@...str.eu, tglx@...uxtronix.de, bigeasy@...uxtronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generalize PCI <-> OF node matching 

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu,  7 Apr 2011 13:26:31 +1000

> This series generalize the PCI <-> OF node matching, moves it to the
> PCI core and make our archs use it. I also rip out while at it a whole
> bunch of useless stuff from microblaze PCI code which was copied from
> ppc32 and is essentially useless there (old workarounds for PowerMac
> and ancient X servers).
> 
> Compile tested on x86_64, microblaze, sparc64 and powerpc.

What tree is this against?  None of the microblaze and x86 bits
apply without rejects against Linus's tree, which is where I'm
trying to test this.

I'll trudge through it, but a heads up about what your patches
are against in the future would be heavily appreciated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/