[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110407152310.5bfeab8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:23:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mjg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable ASPM state clearing regardless of policy
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:54:16 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> Commit 2f671e2d allowed us to clear ASPM state when the FADT
> tells us it isn't supported, but we don't put this into effect
> if the aspm_policy is set to POLICY_POWERSAVE. Enable the
> state to be cleared regardless of policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 3188cd9..eb8ac5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> * the BIOS's expectation, we'll do so once pci_enable_device() is
> * called.
> */
> - if (aspm_policy != POLICY_POWERSAVE) {
> + if (aspm_policy != POLICY_POWERSAVE || aspm_clear_state) {
> pcie_config_aspm_path(link);
> pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link));
> }
hm. why. Presumably this change has some user-observeable effect.
What is that effect, and why is it desirable? ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists