lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302229456.3589.5.camel@x201>
Date:	Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:24:16 -0600
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mjg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable ASPM state clearing regardless of policy

On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:54:16 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Commit 2f671e2d allowed us to clear ASPM state when the FADT
> > tells us it isn't supported, but we don't put this into effect
> > if the aspm_policy is set to POLICY_POWERSAVE.  Enable the
> > state to be cleared regardless of policy.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > index 3188cd9..eb8ac5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  	 * the BIOS's expectation, we'll do so once pci_enable_device() is
> >  	 * called.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (aspm_policy != POLICY_POWERSAVE) {
> > +	if (aspm_policy != POLICY_POWERSAVE || aspm_clear_state) {
> >  		pcie_config_aspm_path(link);
> >  		pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link));
> >  	}
> 
> hm.  why.  Presumably this change has some user-observeable effect.
> 
> What is that effect, and why is it desirable? ;)

Without this, the ASPM clearing from 2f671e2d doesn't actually do
anything when aspm_policy is set to POLICY_POWERSAVE.  A recent BIOS
update on one of my systems left ASPM state on a device while reporting
via the FADT that ASPM isn't supported.  Exactly the situation 2f671e2d
is meant to fix, but didn't because the downstream kernel used powersave
as it's default policy.  With this, the ASPM leftovers still get clear
and the system works again.  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ