[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.vtmcx9kd3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:28:47 +0200
From: "Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@...a86.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, "Dave Hansen" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Timur Tabi" <timur@...escale.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] make new alloc_pages_exact()
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:21:05 +0200, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
> +struct page *__alloc_pages_exact(gfp_t gfp_mask, size_t size)
> {
> unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> - unsigned long addr;
> + struct page *page;
> - addr = __get_free_pages(gfp_mask, order);
> - if (addr) {
> - unsigned long alloc_end = addr + (PAGE_SIZE << order);
> - unsigned long used = addr + PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> + page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order);
> + if (page) {
> + struct page *alloc_end = page + (1 << order);
> + struct page *used = page + PAGE_ALIGN(size)/PAGE_SIZE;
> - split_page(virt_to_page((void *)addr), order);
> + split_page(page, order);
> while (used < alloc_end) {
> - free_page(used);
> - used += PAGE_SIZE;
> + __free_page(used);
> + used++;
> }
Have you thought about moving this loop to a separate function, ie.
_free_page_range(start, end)? I'm asking because this loop appears
in two places and my CMA would also benefit from such a function.
> }
> - return (void *)addr;
> + return page;
> +}
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists