[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302268786.8184.6879.camel@nimitz>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:19:46 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] make new alloc_pages_exact()
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:28 +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:21:05 +0200, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > +struct page *__alloc_pages_exact(gfp_t gfp_mask, size_t size)
> > {
> > unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> > - unsigned long addr;
> > + struct page *page;
> > - addr = __get_free_pages(gfp_mask, order);
> > - if (addr) {
> > - unsigned long alloc_end = addr + (PAGE_SIZE << order);
> > - unsigned long used = addr + PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > + page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order);
> > + if (page) {
> > + struct page *alloc_end = page + (1 << order);
> > + struct page *used = page + PAGE_ALIGN(size)/PAGE_SIZE;
> > - split_page(virt_to_page((void *)addr), order);
> > + split_page(page, order);
> > while (used < alloc_end) {
> > - free_page(used);
> > - used += PAGE_SIZE;
> > + __free_page(used);
> > + used++;
> > }
>
> Have you thought about moving this loop to a separate function, ie.
> _free_page_range(start, end)? I'm asking because this loop appears
> in two places and my CMA would also benefit from such a function.
Sounds like a good idea to me. Were you thinking start/end 'struct
page's as arguments?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists