[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110408162630.GA7354@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 20:26:30 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
tglx@...utronix.de, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, arnd@...db.de,
nico@...xnic.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 6/7] basic_mmio_gpio: support different input/output
registers
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:11:13PM +0100, Jamie Iles wrote:
[...]
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/basic_mmio_gpio.c
> > > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct bgpio_chip {
> > > void __iomem *reg_dat;
> > > void __iomem *reg_set;
> > > void __iomem *reg_clr;
> > > + void __iomem *reg_in;
> >
> > Btw, I wonder if it makes sense (and more logical) for separate output/
> > input registers case to use "reg_dat" for 'input' and 'reg_set' for
> > output?
>
> Sounds like a good idea. Something like this?
Yep, exactly.
[...]
> + } else if (res_set && !res_clr) {
> + if (resource_size(res_set) != resource_size(res_dat) ||
> + resource_size(res_set) != bgc->bits / 8)
We derive bgc->bits from resource_size(res_dat), so '!= bgc->bits / 8'
condition is uneeded.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists