lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D9E579C.3030101@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 Apr 2011 08:32:28 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/4] Add Kconfig option ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG

On 04/08/2011 01:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:29:03AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
>> cmpxchg() is widely used by lockless code, including NMI-safe lockless
>> code.  But on some architectures, the cmpxchg() implementation is not
>> NMI-safe, on these architectures the lockless code may need to a
>> spin_trylock_irqsave() based implementation.
>>
>> This patch adds a Kconfig option: ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, so that
>> NMI-safe lockless code can depend on it or provide different
>> implementation according to it.
>>
>> On many architectures, cmpxchg is only NMI-safe for several specific
>> operand sizes. So, ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG define in this patch
>> only guarantees cmpxchg is NMI-safe for sizeof(unsigned long).
> 
> As this no longer touches any ARM code, I thinky you can drop me from the
> CC list.  Thanks.

OK.  Will do this.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ