| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4DA14710.7020407@parallels.com> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:58:40 -0500 From: Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com> To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> CC: <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: OLS 2010 papers finally indexed. On 04/09/2011 11:57 PM, Américo Wang wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com> wrote: >> FYI, the individual papers, with their abstracts, are linked from: >> >> http://kernel.org/doc/ols/2010 >> > > Nice work, Rob! Thanks a lot! You're welcome. I don't suppose anybody knows where the missing papers _are_? For example, a google search for "Coverage and profiling for realtime tiny kernels" brought up two legacy organizations that locked the paper away in a vault and then buried it in a sea trench: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1900726.1901172 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=5577998 The old "give us money or you'll never see this paper again" tactic. Why anybody would would want to "publish" their work through a non-funny variant of the journal of irreproducible results is an open question, but there you have it. (I love the "downloads 0, citations 0" on the ACM site. Not-publishing the paper there has been, empirically, 100% useless, and they provide the stats to prove it.) Oh well... Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists