[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110410060154.GA24684@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:01:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mrst: correct pin to irq mapping
* Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> As a result, apbt timer and RTC interrupts on Moorestown are within legacy
> IRQ range.
>
> sh-3.2# cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 11249 0 IO-APIC-edge apbt0
> 1: 0 12271 IO-APIC-edge apbt1
> 8: 887 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi dw_spi
> 13: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi INTEL_MID_DMAC2
> 14: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi rtc0
Is there a 'before the patch' /proc/interrupts output as well? Supposedly it's
different and seeing that different output is *way* more descriptive to the
casual commit log reader than a textual explanation only.
Also, i guess this would be .40 material, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists