[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201104111724.57607.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:24:57 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Guan Xuetao" <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: about __BITS_PER_LONG
On Monday 11 April 2011, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@
> * to decide it, but rather check a compiler provided macro.
> */
> #ifndef __BITS_PER_LONG
> -#define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
> +# ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +# define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
> +# else
> +# define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
> +# endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> #endif
>
Unfortunately, this does not work, because the __BITS_PER_LONG definition is meant
for user space. You have to make this depend on a preprocessor macro that
is provided by the compiler based on the command line switches (e.g. -m64) that
a use could pass to the compiler.
In user space, the CONFIG_* symbols are meaningless.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists