[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <004901cbf8b0$4eec1b60$ecc45220$@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:24:02 +0800
From: "Guan Xuetao" <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>
To: "'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: about __BITS_PER_LONG
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:25 PM
> To: Guan Xuetao
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: about __BITS_PER_LONG
>
> On Monday 11 April 2011, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> > @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@
> > * to decide it, but rather check a compiler provided macro.
> > */
> > #ifndef __BITS_PER_LONG
> > -#define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
> > +# ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > +# define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
> > +# else
> > +# define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
> > +# endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> > #endif
> >
>
> Unfortunately, this does not work, because the __BITS_PER_LONG definition is meant
> for user space. You have to make this depend on a preprocessor macro that
> is provided by the compiler based on the command line switches (e.g. -m64) that
> a use could pass to the compiler.
However, there is no conflict between the definition depending on a preprocessor macro and
the definition of asm-generic header.
>
> In user space, the CONFIG_* symbols are meaningless.
Yes, that's the problem. I have not notice it before.
So, only one value can be reserved in such circumstances.
>
> Arnd
Thanks & Regards.
Guan Xuetao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists