lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1104121354010.6953@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Adam McLaurin <lkml@...tas.net>
Cc:	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Loopback and Nagle's algorithm

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Adam McLaurin wrote:

> > It may be caused by an increase in context switch rate, as both sender
> > and receiver are on the same machine.
> 
> I'm not sure that's what's happening, since the box where I'm running
> this test has 8 physical CPU's and 32 cores in total.

Have you tried firing up the testcase under perf, to see what it reveals 
as the bottleneck?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ