[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110412151554.GA20710@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:15:55 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org,
"John W . Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Guiming Zhuo <gmzhuo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 01:44:02PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > + if (pdata->name == NULL || pdata->type == 0) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid name or type in platform data\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + vcc = regulator_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "vrfkill");
> > Wasn't that supposed to use pdata->supply? Actually, there's no member
> > "supply" in the struct?
No, if you're passing supply names through platform data something has
gone wrong - that's a big no no.
> Oh wait, I think I just misunderstood how this works. But if the name is
> "vrfkill" how does that really work with multiple instances?
That's what the struct device is there for. The names are mapped into
physical regulators relative to the device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists