[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110412164806.GC1067@dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:48:06 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
jeremy@...p.org, yinghai@...nel.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen: do not create the extra e820 region at an
addr lower than 4G
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:19:52PM +0100, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
>
> Do not add the extra e820 region at a physical address lower than 4G
> because it breaks e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn().
>
> It is OK for us to move the xen_extra_mem_start up and down because this
> is the index of the memory that can be ballooned in/out - it is memory
> not available to the kernel during bootup.
OK. Stuck it on rc3 queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> index 9c38bd1..a51e010 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ char * __init xen_memory_setup(void)
>
> memcpy(map_raw, map, sizeof(map));
> e820.nr_map = 0;
> - xen_extra_mem_start = mem_end;
> + xen_extra_mem_start = max((1ULL << 32), mem_end);
> for (i = 0; i < memmap.nr_entries; i++) {
> unsigned long long end;
>
> --
> 1.7.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists