[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110413173453.D734.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:34:35 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: mm: convert vma->vm_flags to 64bit
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 09:44 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > Yes, I take Hugh's version because vm_flags_t is ugly to me. And
> > arch
> > > dependent variable size is problematic.
> >
> > Who said it should have arch-dependent size?
>
> Right, it shouldn't. My original patch did that to avoid thinking about
> archs that manipulated it from asm such as ARM but that wasn't the right
> thing to do. But that doesn't invalidate having a type.
type or not type is really cosmetic matter. Then, only if Andrew or Hugh
or another active MM developers strongly requrest to make a type, I'll do.
But, now I haven't hear it.
In short, When both are right code, I prefer to take MM developers preference.
That's MM code. This is the reason why I taked Hugh's choice.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists