[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302685019.28876.80.camel@pasglop>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:56:59 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: mm: convert vma->vm_flags to 64bit
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 08:29 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > Right, it shouldn't. My original patch did that to avoid thinking
> about
> > archs that manipulated it from asm such as ARM but that wasn't the
> right
> > thing to do. But that doesn't invalidate having a type.
>
> No, we don't manipulate it. We only test for VM_EXEC in it in asm.
Yeah whatever, you did something that I didn't spare the brain cell to
try to figure out back then :-) Maybe I should have ... I was also
worried about the embedded folks having a go at me for "bloat they don't
need". But in the end it was wrong, it should always be 64-bit.
But regardless, I still think it should be a specific type. "unsigned
long long" really sucks.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists