lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:23:11 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <>
To:	Andrew Morton <>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Américo Wang <>,
	Jiri Slaby <>, azurIt <>,,,, Jiri Slaby <>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Andrew Morton
<> wrote:
> It's somewhat unclear (to me) what caused this regression.
> Is it because the kernel is now doing large kmalloc()s for the fdtable,
> and this makes the page allocator go nuts trying to satisfy high-order
> page allocation requests?
> Is it because the kernel now will usually free the fdtable
> synchronously within the rcu callback, rather than deferring this to a
> workqueue?
> The latter seems unlikely, so I'm thinking this was a case of
> high-order-allocations-considered-harmful?

Maybe, but I am not sure. Maybe my patch causes too many inner
fragments. For example, when asking for 5 pages, get 8 pages, and 3
pages are wasted, then memory thrash happens finally.

Changli Gao(
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists