lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:24:15 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <>
To:	Tejun Heo <>
Cc:	lkml <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]percpu_counter: make API return consistent value

On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:49 +0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> First of all, please somehow link patches of the same series.  Either
> write a head message and make all the patches replies to it
> (preferred) or chain reply the patches (only when the number of
> patches is small).
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > the percpu_counter_*_positive() API SMP and !SMP aren't consistent. From
> > the API name, we should return a non-negative value for them.
> > Also if count < 0, returns 0 instead of 1 for *read_positive().
> Ummm, on UP, the counters cannot be positive.

>   The _positive interface
> is there to make it easier to cope with deviations introduced by
> unsynchronized modifications by different CPUs.  On UP, such
> deviations don't happen at all so _positive interface is the same as
> the counterpart without the postfix.
I'm confused. the counter could be negative, we have *_dec, *_sub.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists