[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302876920.12428.36.camel@machina.109elm.lan>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:15:20 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:21 +0200, azurIt wrote:
> So it's really not necessary ? It would be better for us if you can go without it cos it means to run buggy kernel for one more day.
>
I can live without it.
> Which kernel versions will include this fix ?
>
As it's a performance fix, I would guess 2.6.39 only. I don't think
-stable pick up performance fixes but I could be wrong.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists