linux-kernel - Re: Regression from 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:15:20 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Regression from 2.6.36

On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:21 +0200, azurIt wrote:
> So it's really not necessary ? It would be better for us if you can go without it cos it means to run buggy kernel for one more day.
> 

I can live without it.

> Which kernel versions will include this fix ?
> 

As it's a performance fix, I would guess 2.6.39 only. I don't think
-stable pick up performance fixes but I could be wrong.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/