linux-kernel - Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:08:46 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@....ntua.gr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two questions about paravirt boot sequence(head_32.S)

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:40:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:33:51 +0300, Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@....ntua.gr> wrote:
> > 2)I think that xen doesn't use any more the hardware subarch boot
> > parameter, and uses a 'different' path/boot sequence, hence the
> > xen_entry in head_32.S is not needed any more. Am I missing something?
> 
> Yep, Xen never actually used it.

Does lguest use it? It looked like a neat idea - what happened?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/