[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302877674.16562.3089.camel@nimitz>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:27:54 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sparse happy borkage when including gfp.h
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 14:33 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hello,
> > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 12:14 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > > > - BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > > > + BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > > > #endif
> > > > - }
> > > > return z;
> > >
> > > Why don't you use VM_BUG_ON?
> >
> > I was just trying to make a minimal patch that did a single thing.
> >
> > Feel free to submit another one that does that. I'm sure there are a
> > couple more places that could use similar love.
>
> I posted another approach patches a second ago. Could you please see it?
Those both look sane to me. Those weren't biting me in particular, and
they don't fix the issue I was seeing. But, they do seem necessary to
reduce some of the noise.
CC'ing the sparse mailing list. We're seeing a couple of cases where
some gcc-isms are either stopping sparse from finding real bugs:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130282454732689&w=2
or creating a lot of noise on some builds:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130284428614058&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=130284431014077&w=2
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists