linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] make sparse happy with gfp.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110415143259.F7BD.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:33:01 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make sparse happy with gfp.h

Hello,

> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 12:14 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > > -             BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > > +     BUG_ON((GFP_ZONE_BAD >> bit) & 1);
> > >  #endif
> > > -     }
> > >       return z;
> > 
> > Why don't you use VM_BUG_ON?
> 
> I was just trying to make a minimal patch that did a single thing.
> 
> Feel free to submit another one that does that.  I'm sure there are a
> couple more places that could use similar love.

I posted another approach patches a second ago. Could you please see it?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/