linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during futex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:27:51 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
	stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during futex_wait
 restart setup

Le vendredi 15 avril 2011 à 10:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> > The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to
> > restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal.
> > 
> > Commit b41277dc7a18ee332d in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally
> > removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the setup
> > of the restart block. Restore the originaly behavior.
> > 
> > Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922
> > 
> > V2: Added references to commit message.
> > V3: Set flag during restart block instead of do_futex()
> > V4: Correct stupid order of assignment mistake pointed out by Eric
> > V5: Correct subject to match implementation, correct stable submission
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Reported-by: Tim Smith <tsmith201104@...oo.com>
> > Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > ---
> >  kernel/futex.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > index bda4157..abd5324 100644
> > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ retry:
> >  	restart->futex.val = val;
> >  	restart->futex.time = abs_time->tv64;
> >  	restart->futex.bitset = bitset;
> > -	restart->futex.flags = flags;
> > +	restart->futex.flags = flags | FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT;
> 
> We only get here when a timeout is pending. So why don't we just do
> the obvious:
> 
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/futex.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1902,16 +1902,13 @@ out:
>  static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart)
>  {
>  	u32 __user *uaddr = restart->futex.uaddr;
> -	ktime_t t, *tp = NULL;
> +	ktime_t t;
>  
> -	if (restart->futex.flags & FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT) {
> -		t.tv64 = restart->futex.time;
> -		tp = &t;
> -	}
> +	t.tv64 = restart->futex.time;
>  	restart->fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
>  
>  	return (long)futex_wait(uaddr, restart->futex.flags,
> -				restart->futex.val, tp, restart->futex.bitset);
> +				restart->futex.val, &t, restart->futex.bitset);
>  }
>  

Because its not suitable for stable ?

This is basically reverting a72188d8a64ebe74, so why do you keep
FUTEX_HAS_TIMEOUT definition ?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/