[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303160594.9887.309.camel@nimitz>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:03:14 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 13:25 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> - provide a statically-allocated buffer to use for get_task_comm() and
> copy current->comm over before printing it, or
>
> - take task_lock(current) to protect against /proc/pid/comm.
>
> The latter probably isn't safe because we could potentially already be
> holding task_lock(current) during a GFP_ATOMIC page allocation.
I'm not sure get_task_comm() is suitable, either. It takes the task
lock:
char *get_task_comm(char *buf, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
/* buf must be at least sizeof(tsk->comm) in size */
task_lock(tsk);
strncpy(buf, tsk->comm, sizeof(tsk->comm));
task_unlock(tsk);
return buf;
}
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists