[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110419105103.GF9462@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:51:03 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@...vell.com>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"johnpol@....mipt.ru" <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
"cbou@...l.ru" <cbou@...l.ru>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"lrg@...mlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] regulator: check name in initialization of
max8925
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:28:23AM -0700, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> There's issue in max8925_core.c since we can't assume regulator[0]
> >always declared in machine driver.
> >What is the issue? It's trivial to skip the regulator if the data is
> >null.
> It skiped all regulators if regulator[0] isn't decleared.
> (pdata == NULL) || (pdata->regulator[0] == NULL)
> So it's a bug.
Surely the obvious fix is to fix the issue and not skip all the
regulators if an individual regulator has no data?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists