linux-kernel - [26/70] tcp: avoid cwnd moderation in undo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110419201045.913635404@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:08:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [26/70] tcp: avoid cwnd moderation in undo

2.6.38-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 67d4120a1793138bc9f4a6eb61d0fc5298ed97e0 ]

In the current undo logic, cwnd is moderated after it was restored
to the value prior entering fast-recovery. It was moderated first
in tcp_try_undo_recovery then again in tcp_complete_cwr.

Since the undo indicates recovery was false, these moderations
are not necessary. If the undo is triggered when most of the
outstanding data have been acknowledged, the (restored) cwnd is
falsely pulled down to a small value.

This patch removes these cwnd moderations if cwnd is undone
  a) during fast-recovery
	b) by receiving DSACKs past fast-recovery

Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2659,7 +2659,7 @@ static void DBGUNDO(struct sock *sk, con
 #define DBGUNDO(x...) do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
-static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct sock *sk, const int undo)
+static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct sock *sk, const int undo_ssthresh)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 
@@ -2671,14 +2671,13 @@ static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct sock *sk
 		else
 			tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh << 1);
 
-		if (undo && tp->prior_ssthresh > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
+		if (undo_ssthresh && tp->prior_ssthresh > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
 			tp->snd_ssthresh = tp->prior_ssthresh;
 			TCP_ECN_withdraw_cwr(tp);
 		}
 	} else {
 		tp->snd_cwnd = max(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh);
 	}
-	tcp_moderate_cwnd(tp);
 	tp->snd_cwnd_stamp = tcp_time_stamp;
 }
 
@@ -2822,8 +2821,11 @@ static int tcp_try_undo_loss(struct sock
 static inline void tcp_complete_cwr(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
-	tp->snd_cwnd = min(tp->snd_cwnd, tp->snd_ssthresh);
-	tp->snd_cwnd_stamp = tcp_time_stamp;
+	/* Do not moderate cwnd if it's already undone in cwr or recovery */
+	if (tp->undo_marker && tp->snd_cwnd > tp->snd_ssthresh) {
+		tp->snd_cwnd = tp->snd_ssthresh;
+		tp->snd_cwnd_stamp = tcp_time_stamp;
+	}
 	tcp_ca_event(sk, CA_EVENT_COMPLETE_CWR);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/