[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110419201046.449606659@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:08:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [31/70] sparc32: Fix might-be-used-uninitialized warning in do_sparc_fault().
2.6.38-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[ Upstream commit c816be7b5f24585baa9eba1f2413935f771d6ad6 ]
When we try to handle vmalloc faults, we can take a code
path which uses "code" before we actually set it.
Amusingly gcc-3.3 notices this yet gcc-4.x does not.
Reported-by: Bob Breuer <breuerr@...net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c
@@ -240,11 +240,10 @@ asmlinkage void do_sparc_fault(struct pt
* only copy the information from the master page table,
* nothing more.
*/
+ code = SEGV_MAPERR;
if (!ARCH_SUN4C && address >= TASK_SIZE)
goto vmalloc_fault;
- code = SEGV_MAPERR;
-
/*
* If we're in an interrupt or have no user
* context, we must not take the fault..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists