linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self registered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110421095701.GA2135@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:57:01 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, patches@...aro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self
 registered

> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > 
> > Just to be sure: Did you double-check if the original licenses were v2
> > or v2+?
> > 
> It seems to me that sdhci-cns3xxx.c, sdhci-dove.c, sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> and sdhci-tegra.c all use v2.
> 
> Actually I do not even know how v2+ is stated.  Do you have an example
> for me to refer?

Check davinci_mmc.c (or grep for 'any later version').

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)