[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DB03A4B.9040807@metafoo.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:08:11 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, toshiharu-linux@....okisemi.com
Subject: Re: Question: GPIO driver how to get irq_base
On 04/21/2011 03:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:09:14AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> In my opinion the best option for expander chips is to allocate a new irq_desc
>> range by calling irq_alloc_descs. It will return the first irq number in the
>> newly allocated range, which will be your irq_base.
>
> Yes, irq_alloc_descs() will give you a range of irqs that the gpio
> expander can use. In many drivers, the irq_base is hard coded in the
> board file and passed in via pdata, but as much as possible I
> recommend avoiding that and letting Linux dynamically allocate the
> irq_base for you. Setting gpio_base to -1 will do this.
>
> The ->to_irq() hook in your driver can translate
> from a gpio number to an irq number for a specific gpio.
>
>> But be aware that this will require SPARSE_IRQ to work.
>
> Why?
>
Because in a non-SPARSE_IRQ setup all irq_descs will be allocated by default.
See early_irq_init for the non-SPARSE_IRQ case in kernel/irq/irq_desc.c.
Though platform code could make irq_descs explicitly available byfirst setting
NR_IRQS to a larger number then it actually requires and then call
irq_free_descs for those irqs which are not used by platform code, but using
SPARSE_IRQ is in my opinion the better alternative in this case.
- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists