[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110422061030.GA13600@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:10:30 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Print a nice description of an irq locking
issue
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 09:41 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>
> > > I probably should modify the lockdep selftests to add an option to show
> > > the output as well as it triggers errors. This would allow me to make
> > > sure the output still works.
> >
> > This does make sense to keep things consistent if we have it.
>
> Actually, Peter informed me that we already do this. Just need to boot
> with debug_locks_verbose=1.
Yeah, that's been in lockdep since v1, that's how i prettified the original
lockdep output.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists