[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303760837.4865.22.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:47:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Geunsik Lim <leemgs1@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] munmap: Flexible mem unmap operation interface for
scheduling latency
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 19:44 +0900, Geunsik Lim wrote:
> Originally, We aim to not hold locks for too long (for scheduling latency reasons).
> So zap pages in ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE byte counts.
> This means we need to return the ending mmu_gather to the caller.
Please have a look at the mmu_gather rewrite that hit -mm last week,
that completely does away with ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE and renders these patches
obsolete.
Also, -rt doesn't care since it already has preemptible mmu_gather.
Furthermore:
> +L: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
is complete crap, linux-rt-users is _NOT_ a development list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists