linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, vdso: SHN_LORESERVE is an inclusive lower bound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1104251850430.26664@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, vdso: SHN_LORESERVE is an inclusive lower bound

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 07:28 AM, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> > Test for >= SHN_LORESERVE instead of > SHN_LORESERVE.
> 
> Yep, seems reasonable.  Did this cause a problem, or is it just
> something you noticed?

I just noticed it (while writing “modpost: Update 64k section support for 
binutils 2.18.50”: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1130613 ).

Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/