lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303808257.3012.3.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:57:37 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegardno@....uio.no>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf and kmemcheck : fatal combination

Le mardi 26 avril 2011 à 10:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar a écrit :

> Eric, does it manage to limp along if you remove the BUG_ON()?
> 
> That risks NMI recursion but maybe it allows you to see why things are slow, 
> before it crashes ;-)
> 

If I remove the BUG_ON from nmi_enter, it seems to crash very fast 



Download attachment "capture2.png" of type "image/png" (132197 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ