[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303896680.15101.1.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:31:20 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Never return a pointer you didn't 'get'
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:39 +0100, Phil Carmody wrote:
> Old - If you don't get the last pointer that you looked at, then it will
> still be put, as there's no way of knowing you didn't get it.
>
> New - If you didn't get it, then it refers to something deleted, and
> your work is done, so return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
Good catch. But I think the code may look slightly simpler as below:
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index c1d5867..aacee45 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1414,9 +1414,12 @@ static void *kmemleak_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
++(*pos);
list_for_each_continue_rcu(n, &object_list) {
- next_obj = list_entry(n, struct kmemleak_object, object_list);
- if (get_object(next_obj))
+ struct kmemleak_object *obj =
+ list_entry(n, struct kmemleak_object, object_list);
+ if (get_object(obj)) {
+ next_obj = obj;
break;
+ }
}
put_object(prev_obj);
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists