[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110427110848.GB31952@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:08:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, balbi@...com, lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> + switch (info->flags) {
> + case 0:
> + if (index == 0)
> + voltage = 0;
> + else if (index < 58)
> + voltage = (600000 + (12500 * (index - 1)));
> + else if (index == 58)
> + voltage = 1350 * 1000;
> + else if (index == 59)
> + voltage = 1500 * 1000;
> + else if (index == 60)
> + voltage = 1800 * 1000;
> + else if (index == 61)
> + voltage = 1900 * 1000;
> + else if (index == 62)
> + voltage = 2100 * 1000;
This reads like a switch statement with a default: case to me.
> +static int twl6030dcdc_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + int vsel = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
> + VREG_VOLTAGE_DCDC);
> + int voltage = 0;
> +
> + if (vsel < 0)
> + return vsel;
> + switch (info->flags) {
This should just call list_voltage() to do the mapping into a voltage or
better yet should be converted into a get_voltage_sel() which will mean
that the core can call list_voltage() for you. Either way you save
duplicating the code to map from selector to voltage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists