[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1104280950380.31735@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, jaxboe@...ionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blkdev: Submit discard bio in batches in
blkdev_issue_discard()
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > Currently we are waiting for every submitted REQ_DISCARD bio separately,
> > but it can have unwanted consequences of repeatedly flushing the queue,
> > so we rather submit bios in batches and wait for the entire batch, hence
> > narrowing the window of other ios going in.
> >
> > Use bio_batch_end_io() and struct bio_batch for that purpose, the same
> > is used by blkdev_issue_zeroout(). Also change bio_batch_end_io() so we
> > always set !BIO_UPTODATE in the case of error and remove the check for
> > bb, since we are the only user of this function and we always set this.
> >
> > Remove bio_get()/bio_put() from the blkdev_issue_discard() since
> > bio_alloc() and bio_batch_end_io() is doing the same thing, hence it is
> > not needed anymore.
> >
> > I have done simple dd testing with surprising results. The script I have
> > used is:
> >
> > for i in $(seq 10); do
> > echo $i
> > dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=/dev/sdc1 bs=4k &
> > sleep 5
> > done
> > /usr/bin/time -f %e ./blkdiscard /dev/sdc1
> >
> > Running time of BLKDISCARD on the whole device:
> > with patch without patch
> > 0.95 15.58
> >
> > So we can see that in this artificial test the kernel with the patch
> > applied is approx 16x faster in discarding the device.
>
> I don't see any major problems here. I would like you to test
> explicitly for queue_flag_discard before submitting any bios, though.
> Previously, after the first bio returned EOPNOTSUPP, you errored out.
> Now, you submit all bios that will end with the same failure. It's
> definitely suboptimal, and you already have the q, so you might as well
> test for this early on.
>
> Also, as I noted to you on irc, another fix required in this area is
> submitting discard requests (the final one in the batch) that do not
> honor the discard granularity exported by the device. That's not
> directly related to this patch, though.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
Thanks for review and comments Jeff, I'll resend patches after I retest
them.
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists