[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110428121244.GA26851@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:42:44 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/18] Increase resolution of load weights
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:18:27PM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> --- kernel/sched.c.orig 2011-04-28 16:34:24.000000000 +0530
> +++ kernel/sched.c 2011-04-28 16:36:29.000000000 +0530
> @@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ calc_delta_mine(unsigned long delta_exec
> lw->inv_weight = 1 + (WMULT_CONST - w/2) / (w + 1);
> }
>
> - tmp = (u64)delta_exec * weight;
> + tmp = (u64)delta_exec * (weight >> SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION);
Should we be fixing inv_weight rather to account for SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION here?
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists