[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201104281415.51183.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:15:51 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:29:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 4. Implement an architecture independent version of dma_map_ops
> > based on the iommu.h API. As Joerg mentioned, this has been
> > missing for some time, and it would be better to do it once
> > than for each IOMMU separately. This is probably a lot of work.
>
> Yes, thats missing for a long time. It will also need some changes to
> the IOMMU-API but that should be doable. The best would be to extend the
> IOMMU-API so that it also supports GART-like IOMMUs. This way every
> dma_ops implementation on all the architectures providing such an IOMMU
> could be covered with the architecture independent dma_ops
> implementation. This would only leave the low-level hardware access in
> the IOMMU drivers.
> I think this also requires to change the current semantics of the
> existing IOMMU-API implementations. I will prepare a write-up of my
> ideas for discussion.
Ok, thanks!
Please include Marek in this, he said he has already started with an
implementation. Any insight from you will certainly help.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists