[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTiku9A3V0kbj+tcO8Sp4o_JZ=d2jzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:16:34 -0700
From: David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/7] ethtool: Call ethtool's get/set_settings callbacks
with cleaned data
Hi,
Stanislaw, as Ben mentions, it's calling phy_ethtool_sset() which is
certainly meant to be an ETHTOOL_SSET op (from its name and comments)
even though its current implementation doesn't actually care for the
value of the cmd field.
Regards,
--
David Decotigny
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:32:38PM -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
>> @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ stmmac_set_pauseparam(struct net_device *netdev,
>>
>> if (phy->autoneg) {
>> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
>> - struct ethtool_cmd cmd;
>> + struct ethtool_cmd cmd = { .cmd = ETHTOOL_SSET };
>> /* auto-negotiation automatically restarted */
>> - cmd.cmd = ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST;
>
> Why did you change ETHTOOL_NWAY_RST to ETHTOOL_SSET ?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists