[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110428184234.GB2559@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:42:34 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump label: Fix jump_label_text_reserved
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:53:43PM -0400, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> This typo prevented jump_label_text_reserved from checking for any
> conflicts in the core kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>
> ---
> kernel/jump_label.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
> index 3b79bd9..4aedde1 100644
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ int jump_label_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> {
> struct jump_entry *iter;
> struct jump_entry *iter_start = __start___jump_table;
> - struct jump_entry *iter_stop = __start___jump_table;
> + struct jump_entry *iter_stop = __stop___jump_table;
> int conflict = 0;
>
> iter = iter_start;
> --
> 1.7.5
>
This is fixed in the jump label re-write patch, which is queued for
2.6.40 in the -tip tree. See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130391786701337&w=2
I believe only kprobes is relying on this check. Did you hit this in
practive using kprobes?
Thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists