[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304033792.18763.214.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:36:32 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace: Add trap entry/exit tracepoints
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:39 -0700, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> From: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>
>
> For debugging and performance monitoring purpose, we often need to trace
> trap entry and exit events. The following patch adds the event
> definition for trap entry/exit and the instrumentation hooks for x86
> platforms. Other platforms should be able to use these events as well
> once they add the corresponding instrumentation.
I'm fine with this patch, but it requires Acks from Ingo or Thomas.
>
> $ echo 1 > debug/tracing/events/trap/enable
> run gdb to genrate some trap events
> $ cat debug/tracing/trace
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.726602: trap_entry: number=3
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.726612: trap_exit: number=3
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.747263: trap_entry: number=1
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.747272: trap_exit: number=1
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.747567: trap_entry: number=3
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.747570: trap_exit: number=3
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.748101: trap_entry: number=1
> <...>-13619 [003] 917.748103: trap_exit: number=1
>
> $ echo 1 > tracing_enabled; ~/trap pagefault; echo 0 > tracing_enabled
> $ cat trace | grep "trap-" | grep number=14 | head
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755792: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755801: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755804: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755807: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755810: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755817: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755819: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755821: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755824: trap_entry: number=14
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.755826: trap_entry: number=14
> $ cat trace | grep "trap-" | grep number=7 | head
> trap-12528 [003] 1159.756283: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-12529 [003] 1159.757427: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-12530 [003] 1159.758277: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-12531 [003] 1159.759172: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-12532 [003] 1159.768643: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-12533 [003] 1159.778195: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-15026 [001] 1557.877722: trap_entry: number=7
> trap-15253 [001] 1621.395067: trap_entry: number=7
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
> +++ b/include/trace/events/trap.h
As this is placed in the generic code, I wonder if a
"trace_trap_entry(id)" is sufficient for all archs.
-- Steve
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM trap
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_TRAP_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_TRAP_H
> +
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(trap,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int id),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(id),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( int, id )
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->id = id;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("number=%d", __entry->id)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(trap, trap_entry,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int id),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(id)
> +);
> +
> +DEFINE_EVENT(trap, trap_exit,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int id),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(id)
> +);
> +
> +#endif /* _TRACE_TRAP_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists