| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:40:37 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Change trap definitions to enumerated values
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:03 -0700, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> From: Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>
>
> The traps are referred to by their numbers and it can be difficult to
> understand them while reading the code without context. This patch adds
> enumeration of the trap numbers and replaced the numbers to the correct
> enum for x86.
I actually like this patch, as I find floating numbers in code annoying.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
> ---
> -DO_ERROR_INFO(0, SIGFPE, "divide error", divide_error, FPE_INTDIV, regs->ip)
> -DO_ERROR(4, SIGSEGV, "overflow", overflow)
> -DO_ERROR(5, SIGSEGV, "bounds", bounds)
> -DO_ERROR_INFO(6, SIGILL, "invalid opcode", invalid_op, ILL_ILLOPN, regs->ip)
> -DO_ERROR(9, SIGFPE, "coprocessor segment overrun", coprocessor_segment_overrun)
> -DO_ERROR(10, SIGSEGV, "invalid TSS", invalid_TSS)
> -DO_ERROR(11, SIGBUS, "segment not present", segment_not_present)
> +DO_ERROR_INFO(INTR_DIV_BY_ZERO, SIGFPE, "divide error", divide_error,
> + FPE_INTDIV, regs->ip)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_OVERFLOW, SIGSEGV, "overflow", overflow)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_BOUNDS_CHECK, SIGSEGV, "bounds", bounds)
> +DO_ERROR_INFO(INTR_INVALID_OP, SIGILL, "invalid opcode", invalid_op,
> + ILL_ILLOPN, regs->ip)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_SEG_OVERRUN, SIGFPE, "coprocessor segment overrun",
> + coprocessor_segment_overrun)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_INVALID_TSS, SIGSEGV, "invalid TSS", invalid_TSS)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_NO_SEG, SIGBUS, "segment not present", segment_not_present)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -DO_ERROR(12, SIGBUS, "stack segment", stack_segment)
> +DO_ERROR(INTR_STACK_FAULT, SIGBUS, "stack segment", stack_segment)
> #endif
> -DO_ERROR_INFO(17, SIGBUS, "alignment check", alignment_check, BUS_ADRALN, 0)
> +DO_ERROR_INFO(INTR_ALIGNMENT, SIGBUS, "alignment check", alignment_check,
> + BUS_ADRALN, 0)
Could you format the above to make it look more tabular and easier to
read.
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> @@ -833,10 +844,10 @@ dotraplinkage void do_iret_error(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> /* Set of traps needed for early debugging. */
> void __init early_trap_init(void)
> {
> - set_intr_gate_ist(1, &debug, DEBUG_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate_ist(INTR_DEBUG, &debug, DEBUG_STACK);
> /* int3 can be called from all */
> - set_system_intr_gate_ist(3, &int3, DEBUG_STACK);
> - set_intr_gate(14, &page_fault);
> + set_system_intr_gate_ist(INTR_BREAKPOINT, &int3, DEBUG_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_PAGE_FAULT, &page_fault);
> load_idt(&idt_descr);
> }
>
> @@ -852,30 +863,30 @@ void __init trap_init(void)
> early_iounmap(p, 4);
> #endif
>
> - set_intr_gate(0, ÷_error);
> - set_intr_gate_ist(2, &nmi, NMI_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_DIV_BY_ZERO, ÷_error);
> + set_intr_gate_ist(INTR_NMI, &nmi, NMI_STACK);
> /* int4 can be called from all */
> - set_system_intr_gate(4, &overflow);
> - set_intr_gate(5, &bounds);
> - set_intr_gate(6, &invalid_op);
> - set_intr_gate(7, &device_not_available);
> + set_system_intr_gate(INTR_OVERFLOW, &overflow);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_BOUNDS_CHECK, &bounds);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_INVALID_OP, &invalid_op);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_NO_DEV, &device_not_available);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> - set_task_gate(8, GDT_ENTRY_DOUBLEFAULT_TSS);
> + set_task_gate(INTR_DBL_FAULT, GDT_ENTRY_DOUBLEFAULT_TSS);
> #else
> - set_intr_gate_ist(8, &double_fault, DOUBLEFAULT_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate_ist(INTR_DBL_FAULT, &double_fault, DOUBLEFAULT_STACK);
> #endif
> - set_intr_gate(9, &coprocessor_segment_overrun);
> - set_intr_gate(10, &invalid_TSS);
> - set_intr_gate(11, &segment_not_present);
> - set_intr_gate_ist(12, &stack_segment, STACKFAULT_STACK);
> - set_intr_gate(13, &general_protection);
> - set_intr_gate(15, &spurious_interrupt_bug);
> - set_intr_gate(16, &coprocessor_error);
> - set_intr_gate(17, &alignment_check);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_SEG_OVERRUN, &coprocessor_segment_overrun);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_INVALID_TSS, &invalid_TSS);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_NO_SEG, &segment_not_present);
> + set_intr_gate_ist(INTR_STACK_FAULT, &stack_segment, STACKFAULT_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_GPF, &general_protection);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_SPURIOUS, &spurious_interrupt_bug);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_COPROCESSOR, &coprocessor_error);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_ALIGNMENT, &alignment_check);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
> - set_intr_gate_ist(18, &machine_check, MCE_STACK);
> + set_intr_gate_ist(INTR_MCE, &machine_check, MCE_STACK);
> #endif
> - set_intr_gate(19, &simd_coprocessor_error);
> + set_intr_gate(INTR_SIMD_COPROCESSOR, &simd_coprocessor_error);
Could you format these too, maybe even ignore the 80 char limit if it
makes it look better.
The numbers were all one or two characters in length and kept the second
argument easy to read. Now with the larger delta in the difference of
characters, it puts a strain on ones eyes.
-- Steve
>
> /* Reserve all the builtin and the syscall vector: */
> for (i = 0; i < FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; i++)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists