[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1304117706.2513.269.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:55:06 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] ARM DMA mapping TODO, v1
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:34 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>
> Radeon memory controller can do non snooped pci transaction, as far as
> i have tested most of the x86 pci bridge don't try to be coherent then
> ie they don't analyze pci dma and ask for cpu flush they just perform
> the request (and i guess it's what all bridge will do), so it endup
> being noncoherent. I haven't done any benchmark of how faster it's for
> the GPU when it's not snooping but i guess it can give 50% boost as it
> likely drastictly reduce pci transaction overhead.
>
> I am talking here about device that you plug into any pci or pcie
> slot, so it's not igp integrated into northbridge or into the cpu.
Right, the card has nothing to do with the snooping process, it's purely
a feature of the bridge, based on a flag optionally set by the card. As
I said earlier, bridges have the freedom to ignore it, which we do on
ppc, so that's a non issue.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists